Shreveport Businessman Accused of Social Media Terrorizing
In Shreveport, Louisiana, local authorities have arrested a businessman, Nicki Daniels, aged 39, on serious charges related to his activities on social media. The Shreveport Police Department reported that on August 16, 2024, Daniels was taken into custody, facing charges of **terrorizing**.
What Happened?
The charge stems from a Facebook post believed to have incited significant unease within the community. Authorities received numerous calls and messages from worried citizens alarmed by the contents of Daniels’ post. Reacting promptly, the police initiated an investigation, leading to the businessman’s arrest.
Business Background
Daniels is known as the founder of **Sleep is for the Rich GunClub & Clothing**, located on Texas Street. The establishment recently celebrated a grand reopening during the Humor & Harmony weekend. In addition to his business ventures, Daniels has made headlines in the past, notably participating in demonstrations in downtown Shreveport in 2020 regarding the controversial removal of a Confederate monument.
Previous Controversies
This isn’t the first time Daniels has been in the public eye for contentious reasons. In 2013, his brand was linked to a robbery when a suspect was seen on surveillance wearing a **Sleep is for the Rich** t-shirt. At that time, he denied any connection to the criminal act, asserting that his brand promotes positivity and hard work.
Legal Implications of Terrorizing Charges
The legal definition of **terrorizing** includes the intentional communication of information suggesting a crime of violence is imminent or that a dangerous situation exists. The charge not only focuses on the immediate threat but also considers the repercussions, which can lead to evacuations and significant disturbances in the community.
Community Reaction
The Shreveport Police Department has emphasized their commitment to addressing such threats seriously. They urged the public to understand that social media posts could carry serious legal consequences and that individuals should think carefully about their online communications and the possible impact on community safety.
